From Citizen Soldiers to
Citizen Legislators
June 1, 2009
By Iraq Veterans for Congress PAC
Special to Roll Call

In a recent
column, Stuart Rothenberg, Roll Call’s
election expert, explained the “dread” that he felt before
meeting with an Iraq veteran
running for Congress. He wrote, “Another Iraq War veteran
running for Congress? Oh, brother. Given the track records of
veterans who have nothing else on their résumés, I wasn’t
optimistic.”
We expect a
reflexive dismissal of the value of military service to appear
in Department of Homeland Security reports, not in a
“nonpartisan analysis of American politics and elections.”
But it has been
clear for years that most “analysis” of House races involves
looking at Federal Election Commission fundraising totals and
ensuring that candidates fit the narrow template that the
pundits have developed for House candidates.
Rothenberg’s
analysis of Iraq vet
candidates is equally superficial and couldn’t be more wrong.
Veterans have
already demonstrated selfless service to country, a credential
sorely missing in Washington, D.C.
The current generation of veterans is pure volunteer. They
joined up when there was no draft, when military service was the
exception rather than the rule as it was in previous
generations. Many Iraq vet candidates enlisted after
9/11, knowing combat was inevitable. And each candidate led
troops in the most arduous of conditions.
Moreover,
Rothenberg is incorrect when he says military service is the
only thing on the résumés of Iraq vets
running for Congress.
Consider these Iraq vet
candidates running as Republicans in 2010:
•
Will Breazeale: a Boeing 737 airline pilot (North Carolina’s 7th)
•
Kevin Calvey: an attorney who left his seat as a state
Representative to serve in the Army Judge Advocate General Corps
(Oklahoma’s 5th)
•
Wayne Mosley: an orthopedic surgeon with a master’s degree in
business administration in negotiations (Georgia’s 12th)
•
Lee Zeldin: an attorney for the Port Authority of New York
and
New Jersey who now runs his
own law firm (New York’s 1st)
•
Vaughn Ward:
a CIA operations officer and Senate legislative aide (Idaho’s 1st)
•
Bill Russell: a retired Army officer and Airborne Ranger who
worked his way up from private to lieutenant colonel and helped
lead 9/11 rescue efforts at the Pentagon (Pennsylvania’s 12th)
•
Allen West: a retired Army officer, high school teacher and
special adviser to the Afghan Army (Florida’s
22nd)
•
Adam Kinzinger: a former McLean County Board member who
joined the Air National Guard after 9/11. He saved the life of a
complete stranger by fighting off a knife-wielding maniac (Illinois’ 11th)
When you compare
these citizen soldiers seeking to become citizen legislators
with other candidates and contrast the military pedigree of
honor, service and sacrifice with the typical background of
House candidates, the differences are stark.
“Strong” House
candidates usually fall into three categories. First, there are
the career politicians. Their primary qualifications are being
well-versed in spending taxpayer money for maximum political
advantage and toeing the party line so as to advance. Above all
they possess a strong sense that they are entitled to represent
their community in
Washington
because it’s their turn.
Failed New York 20th district special election
candidate Jim Tedisco (R) falls squarely within this
all-too-common category of candidate. His dismal loss to a
38-year-old upstart, despite a 70,000-person edge in party voter
registration, indicates the tide might be turning against the
ticket punchers.
Then, there are the
“my politician-relative is my qualification” candidates. In
2008, the daughter of former New Jersey Gov. Christie Todd
Whitman (R) sought the GOP nomination for a House seat in the
Garden
State.
Reporting on her
campaign indicated that 30-year-old Kate Whitman was a good
candidate and never questioned whether her résumé of cushy
public relations gigs, common for political legacies, was
adequate qualification.
Finally, there are
the rich guys, qualified to serve in Congress because of the
size of their wallets. The political class loves these
candidates because they are cash cows for pollsters, consultants
and spin-doctors.
The National
Republican Congressional Committee, out of vision, energy and,
evidently, self-respect, openly courted self-funders to run in
2008. The Republicans got what the political world thought was a
blue chipper in multimillionaire Sandy Treadwell. He spent $7
million and only mustered 38 percent against now-Sen. Kirsten
Gillibrand (D) in the same GOP district that Tedisco would lose
five months later.
Washington prognosticators’ shallow and lazy analyses affect
who receives important institutional support for Congressional
campaigns and dramatically affect the viability of candidates
and how we get our Congress. Fortunately, voters, not political
handicappers, are the ultimate arbiters of who is qualified to
serve in Congress.
The perseverance and dedication that turned defeat
in Iraq into
victory is exactly the type of bold leadership that the country
needs to overcome our current economic and national security
challenges.
Iraq Veterans for Congress PAC
|